Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>]

On 30/11/2004 17:47, Dave Washburn wrote:

> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 10:22, Peter Kirk wrote:
>  
>
> > On 30/11/2004 17:00, Dave Washburn wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Hi Peter,
> > > I don't claim that "meaning" is encoded in a form, in fact that was my
> > > question, and that was why I brought in the citations from other
> > > grammarians who do in fact make such a claim.  I'm not sure where I stand
> > > on this question, which is why I'm so interested to hear Bryan expand on
> > > his comments.  That said, I'll be happy to look at your paper, and I hope
> > > we'll be able to interact about it some when I get done.  Can you suggest
> > > one (fairly easily obtainable!) introductory work on Relevance Theory
> > > that I can examine in addition?
> > >      
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > I would recommend that you look at: E-A. Gutt, Translation and
> > Relevance: Cognition and Context, 2nd edition, St. Jerome, Manchester
> > 2000. This starts with a clear introduction to the theory as a whole,
> > partly in the context of biblical texts. I disagree with how Gutt has
> > applied it to translation, but that is the thrust of my paper.
> >    
>
> Quick question, because I'll have to get it by ILL: is St. Jerome the 
> publisher?
> Thanks!
>
>  
Yes, St Jerome is the publisher. See http://www.stjerome.co.uk/. ISBN 
1-900650-29-0 (Hb) 1-900650-22-3 (Pb).

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/