Biblical Hebrew Forum

["Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>]

Dear Chris,

> HH: There is no Niphal suffix in Prov 2:22. That is a third plural
> ending of the verb.
>
> Hallo Harold.  Sorry but I almost am afraid to contradict since I am no
> scholar (yet) on the hebrew, but for example we have genesis21:32 a niphal
> third plural VERB and prov 2:22 identical except for the sere underneath the
> resh but nevertheless identical.  They are both Niphal verbs.

HH: There is no Niphal verb in Gen 21:32.

                                Yours,
                                Harold Holmyard