b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Maurice A. O'Sullivan" <mauros AT iol.ie>
- To: "Dan and/or Nancy Storm" <danstorm AT comcast.net>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 1.21, Winged Birds
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:48:49 +0100
At 06:52 26/08/2004, Dan and/or Nancy Storm wrote:
However, with the construct state, the second noun takes the definite article.
No, it doesn't.
> kol hanabi< means " the voice of a prophet ", whereas > kol nabi < means " a voice of a prophet " or as Lambdin clearly states in s.68:
>> The definiteness of the entire expression depends on the second noun: if it is made definite with the article or a prope name, the first is also definite <<
And even then we would have to translate the words something like "bird of a wing". Since the definite article is lacking here, I am assuming that we can safely rule out the construct state.
Your assumption is based on a false premise, and so falls.
Look up 'OF in Brown, Driver, and Briggs and you will see: >> abs. Gn 1:20 +, cstr. v 21 <<
Maurice A. O'Sullivan [ Bray, Ireland ]
mauros AT iol.ie
-
[b-hebrew] Gen. 1.21, Winged Birds,
Dan and/or Nancy Storm, 08/26/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 1.21, Winged Birds,
Maurice A. O'Sullivan, 08/26/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 1.21, Winged Birds CORRECTION, Maurice A. O'Sullivan, 08/26/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 1.21, Winged Birds, Karl Randolph, 08/26/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 1.21, Winged Birds,
Maurice A. O'Sullivan, 08/26/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.