Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] qedem

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "George F. Somsel" <gfsomsel AT juno.com>
  • To: leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] qedem
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:36:11 -0400

Yigal,

Yes, I have David. Now that you mention it, I reformatted your message
using David, and it appeared fine. For some reason it comes to me
formatted as SBL Hebrew. Why, I don't know, but that's what happens.

thanks again,

george
gfsomsel
__________

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:43:17 +0200 "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
writes:
> I'm not using any Hebrew at all, but I was using David, which your
> computer may not have. I'l try to reset the default.
>
> Yigal
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: George F. Somsel
> To: leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] qedem
>
>
> Yigal,
>
> You are apparently using the SBL Hebrew font which appears as
> though it were a series of playing cards laid side-by-side when I
> receive it. Would it be possible to switch to another font when you
> post? I find it necessary to hit "reply" and reformat the message
> in another font such as Arial Unicode MS in order to read it.
>
> thanks,
> george
> gfsomsel
> ________________
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:09:40 +0200 "Yigal Levin"
> <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il> writes:
> > In the verse that we're discussing (Deut. 33:27) Qedem is
> clearly
> > paralleled
> > with (olam, which means something like "forever" or
> "everlasting".
> > What are
> > "everlasting arms"?. Interestingly enough, the same pair, Qedem
> and
> > (olam,
> > are also paralleled in verse 15, where it's "mountains of Qedem"
> and
> > "hills
> > of (olam". I can understand the idea of mountains and hills
> being
> > around
> > since creation and for eternity.
> >
> > Yigal
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Noam Eitan" <neitian AT nyc.rr.com>
> > To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 3:36 AM
> > Subject: [b-hebrew] qedem
> >
> >
> > > Qedem is front, east and antiquity. I can understand that if
> you
> > stand
> > with
> > > your back to the sea, the east is in front of you; but how did
> the
> > east
> > > become equated in BH with antiquity? - Noam
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > b-hebrew mailing list
> > > b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > b-hebrew mailing list
> > b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
>From gfsomsel AT juno.com Fri Jul 23 10:31:21 2004
Return-Path: <gfsomsel AT juno.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from m04.lax.untd.com (m04.lax.untd.com [64.136.30.67])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id A733A2009C
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:31:13 -0400
(EDT)
X-UNTD-OriginStamp: w3STQS63J+y68QsFU7oRtEK+jQzWuLJPx40wDgNVe/KNy7apPi5O5Q==
Received: (from gfsomsel AT juno.com)
by m04.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id J28VMKL4;
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:30:36 PDT
To: peterkirk AT qaya.org
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:38:59 -0400
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] qedem
Message-ID: <20040723.103859.-792297.3.gfsomsel AT juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.33
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 9-6,8-47,49-51,52-32767
From: "George F. Somsel" <gfsomsel AT juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:31:21 -0000

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:17:34 +0100 Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
writes:
> On 23/07/2004 15:43, Yigal Levin wrote:
>
> >I'm not using any Hebrew at all, but I was using David, which your
> computer may not have. I'l try to reset the default.
> >
> >
> >
> The issue may be that Yigal's e-mails are set to
> "charset="windows-1255"" which means Hebrew. So mail readers choose
> to
> render it with their default font for display of Hebrew text, which
> may
> not be very suitable for display of English text.
>
> The workaround, at least on Windows, is to choose a default font for
>
> display of Hebrew text which looks reasonable in English, but also
> supports Hebrew when necessary. You could try Arial or Tahoma, which
>
> give reasonable sans-serif Latin script and Hebrew, or Times New
> Roman
> which has more traditional shapes for Hebrew. These don't look very
> nice
> with pointed Hebrew and don't support accents at all, but how often
> do
> you receive pointed or accented Hebrew by e-mail?
>
>
> --
> Peter Kirk
> peter AT qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________

Peter,

That's interesting, but apparently not the answer since my default font
for e-mail is Arial Unicode MS.

george
gfsomsel
>From mattfeld12 AT charter.net Fri Jul 23 15:49:17 2004
Return-Path: <mattfeld12 AT charter.net>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net
[209.225.28.207])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29FD200B7
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:49:08 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from mxip19.cluster1.charter.net (mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net
[209.225.28.149])
by mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
i6NJn4G9015477
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:49:04 -0400
Received: from cpe-66-189-24-170.ma.charter.com (HELO yourus67pi6luv)
(66.189.24.170)
by mxip19.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 15:49:03 -0400
X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,85,1089000000";
d="scan'208"; a="133989220:sNHT22030168"
Message-ID: <000701c470ee$1ba545c0$aa18bd42@yourus67pi6luv>
From: "Walter R. Mattfeld" <mattfeld12 AT charter.net>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:48:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Subject: [b-hebrew] 1450 BCE Exodus ? 'Apiru = Hebrews ?
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:49:17 -0000

Some Conservative Christian scholars understand on the basis of 1 Kings 6:1
that the Exodus was ca. 1446 BCE and after wandering in the Wildernes for 40
years, Canaan's Conquest began under Joshua ca. 1406 BCE.

Solomon is assumed to have come to the throne ca. 970 BCE, we are told that
David reigned 40 years (1 Kings 2:11) so 970 + 40 = 1010 BCE for the
beginning of his reign, and, according to the New Testament, Saul reigned 40
years (Acts 13:21), 1010 + 40 = 1050 BCE for the beginnig of his rule ( I
realize that Jewish scholars don't have to buy into this last equation, it
being a NT Christian notion).

1406 BCE minus 1050 BCE = 356 years, more or less, for the period of the
Judges.

Is there any information about events in Canaan during "the period of the
Judges," 1406-1050 BCE outside of the biblical account ?

Yes. Under Pharaoh Akhenaten who reigned ca. 1350-1334 BCE, we are informed
that the land of Canaan is in a state of rebellion to Egyptian authority
egged-on by forces who are called 'Apiru/Habiru. Loyal Egyptian-appointed
mayors of some Canaanite settlements inform Pharaoh that the intent of the
'Apiru/Habiri to seize all the land of Canaan to the border of Egypt to make
it their own.

Of interest is that the book of Judges tells us that Israel, more
specifically, Judah, shortly after the death of Joshua captures Jerusalem
(Judg 1:8) killing all its inhabitants and setting it on fire. What is
surprising is that we are later told that the Jebusites -the inhabitants of
Jerusalem- were not all slaughtered after all, Judah intermarried with them
(Judg 3:5-6) and when David captured Jerusalem, Jebusites still lived there
(2 Sam 5:6-9), and later he bought a threshing floor for the future temple
from Araunah the Jebusite (2 Sam 24:16).

Is there any archaeological data on Jerusalem under the Judges ? Yes. An
Egyptian-appointed mayor called Abdi-Heba wrote several letters in Akkadian
script on clay tablets to Pharaoh Akhenaten appraising him of the
deteriorating political situation in Canaan. He notes with alarm the growing
power of the 'Apiru, and eventually informs Pharaoh that all the land of
Canaan is lost to the 'Apiru, ONLY his city, Jerusalem is still loyal and
has not gone over to the rebels. He pleads for Pharaoh to send troops to
restore Canaan to Egyptian sovereignty, and concludes his letter, that if
Pharaoh chooses not to send troops, then he requests permission to abandon
the city and come live in Egypt as a loyal servant.

Scholars are divided as to what to make of the "Apiru. Are they the Hebrews
wresting the land of Canaan away from the Canaanites or are they some other
unknown phenomena which the Bible is silent about ?

The date for the 'Apiru activity is ca. 1350-1334 BCE, the reign of
Akhenaten. If Conservative Christian scholars are right about a Conquest
under Joshua ca. 1406 BCE, this means Israel and its Judges have been in
Canaan for approximately 56 years when the 'Apiru rebellion takes place. Did
Jerusalem "fall" to the 'Apiru shortly after Abdi-Heba's letter to Pharaoh ?
If so, how to explain the biblical statement that Jerusaelm was captured by
Judah, all its inhabitants put to the sword, and the city set on fire, after
Joshua's death ?

We are told after conquering the land Joshua assembles the tribes at Shechem
to get them to pledge their loyalty to Yahweh (Josh 24:1-29). Still later,
under the Judges, Israelites at Shechem choose a king for themselves called
Abimelech (Judg 9:1-22), who rules for three years.

Is there any data, archaeologically speaking on Shechem, in the time of the
Judges, 1406-1050 BCE ? Yes. The Egyptian-Appointed mayor of Shechem, caled
Labayu, is busy defending himself in letters to Pharaoh, countering claims
from other mayors that he is an Apiru, "a rebel" to Egyptian authority,
aiding and abetting the 'Apiru seizure of nearby cities loyal to Pharaoh.

If Shechem is an "Israelite" city under Joshua and Abimelech, whose is this
Labayu character ? What's he doing here, in the setting of the Judges, 1406
BCE to 1050 BCE ? Labayu also learns that Pharaoh considers his son to be a
possible Apiru, consorting with those disloyal to Egypt. Still later one of
Labayu's sons appears in the correspondence as being in charge of Pella in
Transjordan and he has to defend himself to Pharaoh. Of interst is that this
son knows an individual called Yishuya, which is similar in sound to Joshua
of Transjordan fame in the Bible. So, how does one reconicle Holy Writ's
scenario of Shechem being in Israelite hands since Joshua's days, yet it has
"Apiru/Habiru rebels residing within it opposing Akhenaten's authority ?

If the "Apiru/Habiru residing in the Hill Country of Canaan and Shechem of
1350-1334 BCE are NOT the Hebrews in the days of the Judges, 1406-1050 BCE,
then WHERE ARE THE HEBREWS ? Why _no mention of them_ in the Tell el-Amarna
correspondence ? Are they just invisible tent-dwelling "phantoms" wandering
the hills with their tents, goats and sheep, waiting to settle down and
build their villages in Iron I ca. 1200-1000 BCE ?

Regards, Walter

Walter Reinhold Warttig Mattfeld y de la Torre, M.A. Ed.

mattfeld12 AT charter.net

www.bibleorigins.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page