Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Aspect

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: furuli AT online.no
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Aspect
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:58:40 +0200

Dear Peter,

What I tried to convey can be illustrated the following way: The verb $YR "to sing" is marked for durativity and dynamicity. Regardless of whether you use the verb as QATAL, YIQTOL, or participle, you can never blot out the dynamicity and durativity of the root. On the other hand, punctiliarity and stativity can change, because a punctiliar verb in Hebrew can in one context have a durative interpretation and a stative verb can in one context have a fientive interpretation. I think most Hebraists would agree with this, possible except in the case with punctiliarity.

Regarding aspect, my claim is that a YIQTOL will always be imperfective, and no context can change that. Could you please refer to scholars who believe in an aspectual interpretation of Hebrew verbs who say that YIQTOL has one aspect in one context and another aspect or no aspect in other contexts?


Best regards

Rolf


Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo











On 10/06/2004 07:40, furuli AT online.no wrote:

...

I would say that the aspect can *only* be seen by verb morphology: QATAL and WEQATAL always signal the perfective aspect. A Hebrew aspect can never be neutralized, but its nature is not always made visible in communication (this is very important but usually neglected.


I think that to be fair to a relative beginner like Eduard, you should warn him that your view is idiosyncratic, and in particular that your statement "A Hebrew aspect can never be neutralized" is in fact an axiom or starting point of your system of linguistic analysis (and one which is quite unacceptable on principle to me and to many others) rather than a result of your analysis.



--
Peter Kirk





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page