Biblical Hebrew Forum

["UUC" <unikom AT paco.net>]

Oh, no objections to my statement that havurah cannot be haburah, and 
therefore not a reference to bruise? How sad...


Sincerely,

Vadim Cherny
>From wattswestmaas AT eircom.net  Sat May 22 07:10:55 2004
Return-Path: <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mail09.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net
        (mail09.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.25])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 825AA200B5
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>; Sat, 22 May 2004 07:10:55 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: (qmail 17443 messnum 261009 invoked from
        network[159.134.245.241/159-134-245-241.as1.chf.cork.eircom.net]);
        22 May 2004 11:10:54 -0000
Received: from 159-134-245-241.as1.chf.cork.eircom.net (HELO chrispc)
        (159.134.245.241)
        by mail09.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 17443) with SMTP;
        22 May 2004 11:10:54 -0000
From: "wattswestmaas" <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
To: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:10:43 +0200
Message-ID: <FAEIIKJEKGHNGLFNMDBCCEKDCBAA.wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300
Cc:
Subject: [b-hebrew] Even-Shoshan + Verb recognition
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 11:10:56 -0000

Dear All,

Please could someone enlighten me with their expertise:  This has often
happened and I need now to understand why.  Sometimes when I look up a verb
in Even shoshan's concordance there is often a descriptive absence of its
form under the root.

For example - Following a reading of Genesis 4:1:  The verb TeLeD
(supposedly an imperfect that I absolutely can not fit into any known
conjugation) Working on the premise that I am at fault in my understanding I
try to look it up.  It is listed on page 468 under number 146. And yes this
provides, in this instance, no further understanding of the way this
imperfect?? is conjugated.

Thankyou, Chris.