Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: [b-hebrew] Studying Modern and Biblical Hebrew

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Trevor Peterson <06PETERSON AT cua.edu>
  • To: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Studying Modern and Biblical Hebrew
  • Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 06:58:30 -0400

>===== Original Message From "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com> =====
>If, on the other hand, your goal is to continue on in your studies towards a
PhD in Hebrew, it will be expected of you to know other Semitic languages in
order to make linguistic comparisons. In which case, take advantage of the
immersion resources and friends who are native speakers. They can certainly
help you towards that PhD.
>

I'm not sure that this is actually different from what Karl said--it may be
only a clarification of the same idea. I agree that Modern Hebrew can be
problematic in the middle of a seminary program. You will probably not have
adequate time to devote solely to language issues, and it will probably be
more useful for the purposes that language serves in seminary training to
focus your attention on reading BH. Not that a knowledge of Modern Hebrew
can't help in this, but you'll also need to process the differences between
the two languages, and if you don't have adequate time, it could cause
problems further down the road.

But regarding the above cited paragraph, I would say that if you plan to
pursue a Ph.D. in Hebrew, you'll need to deal with the various stages of the
language at some point, so learning Modern Hebrew now would be useful. If you
plan to pursue a Ph.D. in ancient Semitic languages, even if your focus will
be on Hebrew, you will need to learn other languages and develop skills in
comparing them with each other. Since Arabic is probably the most useful
language for this purpose (or at least, it has been made use of more than
others), I would recommend learning Arabic rather than Modern Hebrew (if you
don't have the time or energy to do both). The classical form of the language
would be more useful than modern, but Modern Standard Arabic is pretty
closely
based on classical. With Arabic, there is a more organic connection to past
stages than with Hebrew, since it has persisted as a widely spoken language
since the classical period. Arabic is also more archaic and seems to preserve
features that other Semitic languages, including Hebrew, lost along the way.
(In some cases, these features are retained in classical, and the changes to
the present day seem to parallel the changes some other Semitic languages
must
have gone through before our earliest written evidence.) Of course, if you
have the resources available to study Modern Hebrew but not Arabic, that will
affect your decision.

Trevor Peterson
CUA/Semitics





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page