Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Dave Washburn <dwashbur AT nyx.net>]

Throughout the article, he is arguing in favor of LXX readings and sees this 
as another place where the LXX preserves the original text.

On Wednesday 03 March 2004 01:09, Philip Engmann wrote:
> "The language of verses 5 (LLX) [sic], 19, 20, seems decisive in favor
> of the former."
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> What does this mean?
>
> Philip.
>
>
>
> Philip,
> According to P.W. Skehan, "A Fragment of the 'Song of Moses' (Deut 32)
> from
> Qumran" in BASOR 136 (1954) p. 12-15, v. 43 reads as follows:
>
> hrnynw $mym `mw
> wh$txww lw kl 'lhym
> ky dm bnyw yqwm
> wnqm y$yb lcryw
> wlmsn'yw y$lm
> wykpr 'dmt `mw
>
> Skehan's note says
> in part on v.43, "bnyw, with LXX, as against MT `bdyw.  The language of
> verses 5 (LLX) [sic], 19, 20, seems decisive in favor of the former."

-- 
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Learning about Christianity from a non-Christian
is like getting a kiss over the telephone.