Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] DSS Deut 32:43?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Søren Holst <sh AT teol.ku.dk>
  • To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] DSS Deut 32:43?
  • Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:34:03 +0100

It certainly should be 4QDeut[q], thanks for catching that one.

best
Soren

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Philip Engmann [SMTP:phil-eng AT ighmail.com]
> Sendt: 3. marts 2004 07:49
> Til: 'Søren Holst'; 'b-hebrew'
> Emne: RE: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q,match the LXX
> Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?
>
> "wehishtachawu lo (kol) 'elohim" (thus 4QDeut[j]).
>
> Søren,
> Should this not be 4QDeut[q]? [1]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Søren Holst
> Sent: 01 March 2004 14:59
> To: b-hebrew
> Subject: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q,match the LXX
> Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?
>
>
> No other biblical Qumran text seems to preserve Deut 32,43, nor does it
> (going by Dave Washburn's index) seem to be quoted in any nonbiblical text.
>
> The BHS lumps together LXX, Qumran and the epistle to the Hebrews in one
> note, saying that these sources add the equivalent of "wehishtachawu lo
> (kol) 'elohim" (thus 4QDeut[j]) or "... beney 'el" (thus LXX and, changing
> "huioi" to "angelloi", also Hebrews)
>
>
> Soren, Copenhagen
>
> __________________________________
>
> _____
>
> [1] This is just for clarification.



  • [b-hebrew] DSS Deut 32:43?, Søren Holst, 03/03/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page