Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Søren Holst <sh AT teol.ku.dk>]

It certainly should be 4QDeut[q], thanks for catching that one.

best
Soren

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra:  Philip Engmann [SMTP:phil-eng AT ighmail.com]
> Sendt:        3. marts 2004 07:49
> Til:  'Søren Holst'; 'b-hebrew'
> Emne: RE: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q,match the LXX 
> Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?
> 
> "wehishtachawu lo (kol) 'elohim" (thus 4QDeut[j]).
>  
> Søren,
> Should this not be 4QDeut[q]? [1]
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org 
> [mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Søren Holst
> Sent: 01 March 2004 14:59
> To: b-hebrew
> Subject: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q,match the LXX 
> Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?
>  
>  
> No other biblical Qumran text seems to preserve Deut 32,43, nor does it 
> (going by Dave Washburn's index) seem to be quoted in any nonbiblical text.
>  
> The BHS lumps together LXX, Qumran and the epistle to the Hebrews in one 
> note, saying that these sources add the equivalent of "wehishtachawu lo 
> (kol) 'elohim" (thus 4QDeut[j]) or "... beney 'el" (thus LXX and, changing 
> "huioi" to "angelloi", also Hebrews)
>  
>  
> Soren, Copenhagen
>  
> __________________________________
> 
>   _____  
> 
> [1] This is just for clarification.