b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Deborah Millier <deborahmillier AT yahoo.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Re: stuma in Deut 5,21
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:57:32 -0800 (PST)
Karl Randolph wrote:
> What I noticed is that
> those verses mention
> the ten statements of
> the covenant, not ten
> commands.
Okay, in that case, there dont exist ten
commandments at all. Ten utterances or matters,
yes. But *commandments*, no.
It might be popular Christian (or even Jewish) belief
that there were "ten commandments." However, such a
view does not exist among those better informed.
Agreed?
> As a legal document, the
> covenant has its first
> statement identifying the
> parties to it. Then I read
> this particular legal
> document as having nine
> commands following its
> introductory statement.
. . .Which was uniformly classified within the Torah
as MYRBDH TR&( (ASERET HADVARIM)with the number
ten receiving prominence. Therefore any stabs at
*nine* (by you or anyone else) are inorganic to the
text(s) of the Torah.
KOL TUV,
-- Michael Millier
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
-
[b-hebrew] Re: stuma in Deut 5,21,
Deborah Millier, 03/02/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: stuma in Deut 5,21, Karl Randolph, 03/02/2004
- [b-hebrew] Re: stuma in Deut 5,21, Deborah Millier, 03/02/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: stuma in Deut 5,21, Karl Randolph, 03/02/2004
- [b-hebrew] Re: stuma in Deut 5,21, Raymond de Hoop, 03/03/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.