Biblical Hebrew Forum

["S. L." <lyosovs AT cityline.ru>]

  Dear Lee,
see GK par.112 PP et seq. for "a number of passages which cannot be classed
with any of those hitherto mentioned".
  Serge
----- ???????? ????????? -----
??: "Lee R. Martin" <lmartin AT vol.com>
????: "S. L." <lyosovs AT cityline.ru>
?????: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
??????????: ???????, ??? 03, 2003 3:20
????: Re: ??: [b-hebrew] weqatal perfectives?


> Dear Serge,
> Thank you very much for your response.
> KG 112, however, discusses weqatals that are "converted," or
> imperfective.  It does not list nor allow for weqatals that may be
> perfective.
> Blessings,
> Lee R. Martin
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 06:41  PM, S. L. wrote:
>
> > See KG par.112 for a list + Longacre in "BH and Discourse Linguistics"
> > (1994) for an attempt of explanation.
> >     Serge Lyosov
> > ----- ???????? ????????? -----
> > ??: "Lee R.Martin" <lmartin AT vol.com>
> > ????: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> > ??????????: ???????, ??? 01, 2003 9:53
> > ????: [b-hebrew] weqatal perfectives?
> >
> >
> >> Does anyone have a list of the so-called "non-converted" weqatals,
> >> those that do not seem to indicate habitual or repeated actions (e.g.
> >> Gen 15:6)?
> >>
> >> I would like to check your list with the one that I have compiled.
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Lee R. Martin
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> b-hebrew mailing list
> >> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >>
> >
>
>