b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL

From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
To: rosewalk AT concentric.net, b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject: Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:22:59 EST

In a message dated 1/29/2002 12:37:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, rosewalk AT concentric.net writes:

Why need a foundation other than Nachmanides? Nachmanides understood
Biblical Hebrew grammar as well as, if not better, than all the references
which you have heard of.

It would appear that you would be more suited to a Talmudic list than to b-hebrew. Here we don't establish matters by quoting one source - no matter how respected the authority.

gfsomsel

ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Shoshanna Walker, 01/29/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Polycarp66, 01/29/2002
  - Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Shoshanna Walker, 01/29/2002
  - PS Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Shoshanna Walker, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, ian goldsmith, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Shoshanna Walker, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Polycarp66, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Shoshanna Walker, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Polycarp66, 01/29/2002
  - Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Shoshanna Walker, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Polycarp66, 01/29/2002
- Re: ELOHIM NOT PLURAL, Moshe Shulman, 01/30/2002