b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Christian Hoffmann <christian.hoffmann AT wsl.ch>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: qatal vs. katab
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:28:27 +0100
Dear haverim,
Not so long we discussed the choice of qatal as the paradigmatic stem for
Hebrew verb grammar. We went through all the possible combinations, sorting
out unwanted consonants, like
aleph, he, waw, khet, yod, ayin, resh: weak letters -> weak stems, rarely
regular
beth, kaph, pe: change of hardness with veth, khaph, fe
mem: is also a prefix
nun, taw: occur in weak stems
As a result, letters like
gimel, dalet, zayin, tet, lamed, samekh, tsade, qoph, sin, shin.
will remain. qatal is one possible combination. I don't remember which else
seemed attractive.
Does anybody know a written source for this kind of reasoning?
Shalom
--christian
Dr.sc.math.Christian W. Hoffmann
Mathematics and Statistical Computing
Landscape Modeling and Web Applications
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL
Zuercherstrasse 111
CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
phone: ++41-1-739 22 77 fax: ++41-1-739 22 15
e-mail: christian.hoffmann_at_wsl.ch__prevent_spamming
www: http://www.wsl.ch/staff/christian.hoffmann/
-
qatal vs. katab,
Christian Hoffmann, 12/14/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: qatal vs. katab, Maurice A. O'Sullivan, 12/14/2001
- RE: qatal vs. katab, Penner, 12/14/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.