Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: Atonement vs Redemption

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: RE: Atonement vs Redemption
  • Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:45:12 -0400

An excellent discussion of kipper (which is usually translated atonement) can
be found in Jacob Milgrom's Anchor Bible Commentary on Leviticus Vol 1.
He is the authority on the subject, to my way of thinking anyway.


In order to understand the Torah, especially concepts such as these, you have to go to JEWISH sources. There is no other authority.

The word translated redeem is pdh. YHWH redeemed the Jews from
Egyptian bondage. Redeem doesn't have anything to do with sin.


It has to do with saving. Podeh UMatzil


Kipper does, but the meaning of sin, HT), is completely different from
the CHristian notion.


It must be remembered that it is the altar that is atoned for.

Huh???


The sin of the individual (such as when she menstruates) affects
the altar. The altar is then kippered by the blood of the sacriffice.
It is only by constantly purging the altar with sacrificial blood is
YHWH willing to remain in the temple. When the sins become
so great that the altar cannot be purged,


G-d's "presence" in the Temple, has to do with redemption

KPR, atonement, did NOT exclusively happen in the Temple with blood sacrifice, on an altar.


then he leaves the temple,
and it becomes vulnerable to destruction. This is what happened
in 586 bce, and again in 70. Ezekiel describes YHWH leaving the
temple, and causing it to be destroyed. Later prophets describe
his return: Isaiah 40-55, Ezekiel 40-48, Zechariah 1-8.


When there is no altar, as now, there is nothing to kipper, the
issue is really moot.


Not really moot at all.

Shoshanna


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page