Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: I WILL BE (1st person is unique?)

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Daniel Wagner" <dan.wagner AT netzero.net>
  • To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: I WILL BE (1st person is unique?)
  • Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:13:15 -0400


Concerning such quotes as

> "Aside from Ex. 3:14, the 1st person singular imperfect of hayah
> occurs 64 times in the OT. If we ignore the 22 instances of its use
> with the vav-consecutive and the uncertain passages Job 3:16; 12:4,
> the form is always future in meaning, or at least optative.....

and statements like

> Please, then cite an example from some OTHER place in the Torah, where
> "Ehyeh" is not future

why have some of us (or those we quote) been isolating 1st person from 2nd
and 3rd person in this discussion? Does the person also change the
tense/aspect/whatever of the verb?
(I'm aware of course that "jussive" relates to 2nd and 3rd persons, and
"cohortative" relates to 1st person only, but that is not related to what i'm
seeing in recent posts concerning the 1st person of HYH in Ex. 3.)

What is the basis for excluding 2nd/3rd person analogies of HYH (or even
other verb roots) to understand the function of _)EHYEH_ here? If the intent
*were* to communicate present tense, what verb form would he have used?

If the view i presented is not correct (i.e., translating it "I am I AM"
without any major significance to the tense), i'm attracted to Niccacci's
view, translating them respectively as modal (volitive) and past
frequentative, something like "I WILL BE WHAT I'VE BEEN BEING." It certainly
seems to work well in context of verses 12-15.

Dan Wagner



NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://www.netzero.net



  • Re: I WILL BE (1st person is unique?), Daniel Wagner, 05/03/2001

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page