b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics

From: "Henry Churchyard" <churchh AT usa.net>
To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 15:23:09 -0500 (CDT)

Oops, sorry, I had overlooked the following passage where you
explained further about the apparently missing 397 QATAL forms:

> From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:21:12 +0200
> Subject: QATAL C/RT

> Of the 13922 QATALs in the Tanach I found
> RT before C = past reference 7450 (53,5 %)
> RT coinciding with C = present ref. 2505 (18 %), perfect ref. 2605 (18,7 %)
> RT after C = future reference 965 (6,9 %)
> Modal 392 (2,8 %)

However, (7450+2505+2605+965+392) equals 13917, not 13922, so I'm
still slightly confused...

--
Henry Churchyard churchh AT usa.net http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/

WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Henry Churchyard, 08/12/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Henry Churchyard, 08/13/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Henry Churchyard, 08/13/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Rolf Furuli, 08/13/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Rolf Furuli, 08/14/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, yochanan bitan-buth, 08/14/2000
  - Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Rolf Furuli, 08/14/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Rodney K. Duke, 08/15/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Numberup, 08/15/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Henry Churchyard, 08/16/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Camille Bessette, 08/16/2000
- Re: WEQATAL vs. QATAL statistics, Rolf Furuli, 08/19/2000