b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Naama Zahavi-Ely <nxzaha AT wm.edu>
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Leviticus 12:1-5
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 15:40:23 -0400
May I suggest that any discussion of 'uncleanliness' after birth has to cover
what (in
practical terms) did it mean to be 'unclean'? For example, is it a time of
being
excused from normal household duties (that is, a time of rest for the mother)?
Best,
Naama
Tony Costa wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> Do any of you know why it is according to Lev 12:1-5 a woman would be
> considered "unclean" for double the amount of time if she gave birth to a
> daughter as opposed to a son? If she bears a son, the mother is unclean for
> a week, to be continued for another 33 days, if a daughter she is "unclean"
> for two weeks, to be continued for another 66 days. Any thoughts on why this
> is the case? Many thanks.
>
> Tony Costa, B.A.
> University of Toronto
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: nxzaha AT wm.edu
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
Leviticus 12:1-5,
Tony Costa, 05/09/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Leviticus 12:1-5, Ray Clendenen, 05/09/2000
- Re: Leviticus 12:1-5, Naama Zahavi-Ely, 05/09/2000
- Leviticus 12:1-5, Harold R. Holmyard III, 05/09/2000
- RE: Leviticus 12:1-5, Bill Ross, 05/09/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.