b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: yochanan bitan <ButhFam AT compuserve.com>
- To: "Bryan Rocine" <brocine AT earthlink.net>
- Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Ariyel's Flower,correction
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 07:06:41 -0500
A correction/disclaimer:
BR:
<<Both Randal Buth and Peter Kirk have suggested holeket for a verb
in the second clause rather than a qatal>>
Actually, not. The opposite: I prefer halexa, as I first stated. "best"
means my recommendation.
(explaining an ambiguously incorrect form: halak:t, I wrote:
" -a- halexa [a.k.a.:'halekah'] is best, or holexet".
The holexet was an attempt at fixing/interpreting the student's consonantal
text.)
If a student wanted to start a story with a participle I would accept it,
though I myself wouldn't suggest it. Dream reports start with participles.
Qohelet could use them and some wisdom literature. Rabbi stories like them.
But your question has a point: I can't say if you ever get two same subject
clauses in such a biblical text. You certainly get participles/verbless
clauses followed by either vav ha-hippuk for the approriate temporal
direction.
braxot
Randall Buth
- Re: Ariyel's Flower,correction, yochanan bitan, 01/27/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.