Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Assyrian King of Babylon ?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Peter Kirk"<peter_kirk AT sil.org>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Assyrian King of Babylon ?
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:14:00 -0500


Yes, but note Isaiah 39 (=2 Kings 20:12-19): though Hezekiah welcomed
the envoys of Merodach-Baladan (named here), Isaiah saw the threat
behind this act of diplomacy. Perhaps this, rather than the reign of
Ahaz, is the setting for chapters 13-14.

Peter Kirk


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Assyrian King of Babylon ?
Author: <mattfeld AT mail.pjsnet.com> at Internet
Date: 22/01/2000 21:18


Mr. Gathaus observed:

If Isaiah 13-14 dates from the 8th century BCE, then the King of Babylon is
likely to have
been Marduk-apal-iddina (Merodach-baladan) who defied Sargon V for a while
until he was
beaten back to the marshlands at the head of the Gulf. Yet, we must ask what
the Medes
have to do with things here. It's more likely that either the statement
about the Medes is
a later addition from after 540 BCE, or the whole thing dates from after 540

The problem with Marduk-apal-iddina being the King of Babylon that Isaiah is
railing about, is the coming up with a scenario to explain why Israel would
feel threatened by the Babylonian King. Like Hezekiah, he was no friend of
the Assyrians, and like Hezekiah, he rebelled unsuccessfully. An Assyrian
King of Babylon would make more sense as the recepient of Isaiah's wrath.

All the best,

Walter Reinhold Warttig Mattfeld
Walldorf by Heidelberg
Baden-Wurttemburg
Germany





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page