b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
RE: Autographs, MSS and REAL Historiography Re: Methods in biblical scholarship
- From: Moshe Shulman <mshulman AT ix.netcom.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: RE: Autographs, MSS and REAL Historiography Re: Methods in biblical scholarship
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 16:27:24 -0500
At 10:04 PM 12/28/1999 +0100, you wrote:
>> > [Niels Peter Lemche]
>> > Your hvae so litrtle sense of what history was about in ancient
>> >times that I suggest that you start studying the subject. I would suggest
>> >that you start by reading Quintillian, and continue with Cicero, and then
>> >you can come back.
>> I prefer Thucidides myself. History in ancient times is what it is now:
>> propaganda. The term objective historuy is an oxymoron.
> [Niels Peter Lemche] I understand your point, but I asked you to
>read the theory before you read the examples. Thucydides and Herodotus were
>considered as two very different cases of histoery writing in Antiquity.
>They were well aware of the difference. It is not something later
>rationalization created.
Maybe, but there are clear purposes in his writting, just as there were to
Josephus.
moshe shulman mshulman AT NOSPAMix.netcom.com 718-436-7705
CHASSIDUS.NET - Yoshav Rosh http://www.chassidus.net
Outreach Judaism http://www.outreachjudaism.org/
ICQ# 52009254
-
RE: Autographs, MSS and REAL Historiography Re: Methods in bibl ical scholarship,
Niels Peter Lemche, 12/28/1999
- RE: Autographs, MSS and REAL Historiography Re: Methods in biblical scholarship, Moshe Shulman, 12/28/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.