b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: peter_kirk AT sil.org
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re[14]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter)
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 23:29:56 -0500
Please, list moderators, how long do I have to suffer this kind of
abuse simply for following the scholarly method of critically reading
what other scholars have written and drawing conclusions from it?
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re[13]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter)
Author: <mc2499 AT mclink.it> at Internet
Date: 07/12/1999 01:54
<snip>
.. All you have to do is show some evidence, rather than opting for
authority, but you almost never do....
<snip>
.. All the literary evidence...
PK: Except for that which you have arbitrarily chosen to reject.
Exactly what literary evidence are you referring to? Do you have
better evidence of its dating than I have given for Hebrews and LXX
Genesis?
.. from the cultural background of the area goes for creation out of
pre-existent matter...
<snip>
Impute circularity
Invoke authority
Go off in tangents
Impose a priori theological understandings
Avoid ancient understandings
Ignore both archaeology and epigraphy
>so shut up!
Impressive scholarship, Peter.
<snip>
-
Re: Re[6]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter),
Ian Hutchesson, 12/03/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re[8]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), peter_kirk, 12/04/1999
- Re: Re[8]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), Ian Hutchesson, 12/05/1999
- Re[10]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), peter_kirk, 12/05/1999
- Re: Re[10]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), Ian Hutchesson, 12/05/1999
- Re[12]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), peter_kirk, 12/06/1999
- Re: Re[12]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), Ian Hutchesson, 12/07/1999
- Re[14]: Genesis 1 & 2 (Peter), peter_kirk, 12/07/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.