b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: peter_kirk AT sil.org
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Cc: <michaelwm AT earthlink.net>
- Subject: Re[2]: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:43:18 -0500
Another thought on "tohu webohu", espcially as the second word occurs
only in close relationship with the first. In Azerbaijani, I think in
Farsi, and also in Russian as spoken in Azerbaijan, there is a common
colloquial idiom in which a word is repeated with its first consonant
replaced by "m" on the second occurrence, with the meaning "and that
sort of thing". The second word is thus actually a nonsense word if
taken separately. For example, "harj" means "disorder" (weakened in
Arabic from the Hebrew HRG = "kill"), and "harj-marj" means "time of
disorder, chaos, anarchy"; and I heard "Andrey-mandrei" meaning
"Andrei and people like him".
Could it be that this sort of thing, which can easily spread from
language to language as I have seen, may be happening with "b"
(another bilabial consonant) rather than "m" in Hebrew? This would
make "bohu" actually a nonsense word, and the hendiadys "tohu webohu"
would be a close equivalent of "harj-marj".
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber)
Author: <gathas AT mail.usyd.edu.au> at Internet
Date: 29/11/1999 15:54
> On the matter of "tohu vabohu," I passed the following along to Michael,
> and thought I'd see what it generates on the list as well.
>
> >Finally, when I studied Genesis. . . the professor pointed out that the
> expression "tohu vabohu" appears in just one other place in the Bible
> (Jeremiah, which you noted in your original post), but there it seems to be
> simply quoting Genesis. He went on to point out that there are no such
> words in modern Hebrew, or in any other sample of ancient Hebrew that we
> have. This makes it a "hapax legomenon," which means we have no way of
> knowing what it means, except from what we can derive from the context.
Actually, "hapax legomenon" means "a word mentioned only once". This
shouldn't b
e
used
with reference to the words _tohu_ and _bohu_. The word 'tohu' occurs in the
following
biblical references:
-Gen 1:2
-1 Sam 12:21
-Job 26:7
-Isa 24:10
-Isa 34:11
-Isa 40:17
-Isa 41:29
-Isa 44:9
-Isa 45:18, 19
-Isa 45:19
-Isa 59:4
-Jer 4:23
Of particular note are Isa 40:17 and 41:29, in which the word _tohu_ is
parallel
ed
with
the word _'ephes_, which means "nothing" or "nought" or "none". The idea of
_toh
u_
is that
it refers to something that has no substance, no essence, no worth, no
implicit
existence
of its own. The context of the references mentioned above help to elucidate
this
.
The word _bohu_ occurs in:
-Gen 1:2 (along with _tohu_)
-Isa 34:11 (along with _tohu_)
-Jer 4:23 (along with _tohu_)
Since the Gen and Jer references are practically identical, the Isa reference
is
most
instructive. It comes in an oracle directed primarily against Edom in which
Yahweh
threatens to make Edom a haunt of wierd and wild animals because of its
destruction.
Yahweh threatens to knock the building of Edom down to stretch over it a
"line o
f
_tohu_
and stones of _bohu_." The implication is that the cities of Edom will no
longer
exist.
The builder's line of "non-existence" will be brought to bear over the towns
and
the
building stones will be knocked down, disordered, disarrayed, made chaotic,
featureless,
void and vacant. That is the implication of _bohu_.
I don't think there are single words in English that accurately portray all
the
import of
_tohu_ and _bohu_. The closest we can get, I think, are "without substance"
and
"disarrayed" respectively.
Best regards,
George Athas
Dept of Semitic Studies,
University of Sydney
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tel Dan Inscription Website
http://members.xoom.com/gathas/teldan.htm
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
< gathas@ mail.usyd.edu.au >
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [Peter_Kirk AT sil.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-b-hebrew-14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber),
Tony Prete, 11/28/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber), Armando Cottim (DSI), 11/29/1999
- Re: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber), George Athas, 11/29/1999
- Re: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber), somi, 11/30/1999
- Re: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber), Lee R. Martin, 11/30/1999
- Re[2]: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber), peter_kirk, 11/30/1999
- Re: Re[2]: tohu vabohu (was: Re: new subscriber), Dave Washburn, 11/30/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.