b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Lee R. Martin" <lmartin AT vol.com>
- To: "George Athas" <gathas AT mail.usyd.edu.au>
- Cc: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Genesis 2:4
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:28:01 -0500
George Athas wrote:
> simply different. The scribes could have opted to put Gen 2:4ff at the
beginning so that
> our Hebrew Bibles started with "This is the history of heavens...." It's a
bit like saying
> that the second poem in an anthology of poems is necessarily the end of
the first poem and
> must come after the first poem. It isn't and it doesn't have to. Or that
Hymn 2 is
> actually the last verse of Hymn 1. It wouldn't be. They're just different.
We should note
> and appreciate the differences of the creation accounts in Genesis
Dear George,
I agree with your statement that we should appreciate the differences
between the two creation accounts. Your point is very important. I
disagree, however, with your statement that Gen. 2:4 could come before Gen.
1:1. This is where Gunkel erred. The Hebrew word "toledoth" does not mean
"origin," it means "progeny." Gen 1 tells of the creation of "heaven and
earth," then Gen 2 tells of the progeny of heaven and earth. Please see
Brevard Childs for an excellent theological explanation of the two accounts.
I have recently written a paper on the topic that will be published in the
spring in a Festschrift.
Lee R. Martin
-
Genesis 2:4,
Lee R. Martin, 11/30/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Genesis 2:4, Noel O'Riordan, 11/30/1999
- Re: Genesis 2:4, George Athas, 11/30/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.