b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Søren Holst <sh AT teol.ku.dk>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: SV: Rune/Hebrew
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 20:00:13 +0200
At least only in the VERY limited sense that some think they're at least
partly derived from/influenced by Latin alphabet, which in turn has roots
back to the Semitic alphabets.
Soren Holst
Copenhagen
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Jim West [SMTP:jwest AT highland.net]
> Sendt: 5. oktober 1999 19:02
> Til: Biblical Hebrew
> Cc: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> Emne: Re: Rune/Hebrew
>
> At 12:54 PM 10/5/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >I was looking over some old forms of alphabets, and came across "Rune" or
> >"Runic" I suppose, archaic German?
>
> No- more like very archaic scandinavian.
>
> >
> >Are they in any way influenced by Aramaic or ancient Hebrew letters?
>
> not in the least.
>
> Best,
>
> Jim
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Jim West, ThD
> email- jwest AT highland.net
> web page- http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: sh AT teol.ku.dk
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
Rune/Hebrew,
gs02wmr, 10/05/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Rune/Hebrew, Jim West, 10/05/1999
- SV: Rune/Hebrew, Søren Holst, 10/05/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.