Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Re[3]: Judges 5:30

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Henry Churchyard <churchyh AT ccwf.cc.utexas.edu>
  • To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: Re: Re[3]: Judges 5:30
  • Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:08:43 -0500 (CDT)


> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:03:48 -0400
> From: peter_kirk AT sil.org
> Subject: Re[3]: Judges 5:30

> Dear Ben, Thank you for bringing us back down to the context. [...]
> you are right to see that this is actually a female viewpoint and
> the word chosen should be appropriate to that. The women would be
> interested in the girls as servants and simply ignore how the men
> used them.

I agree the whole thing is somewhat convoluted (Deborah and Barak
singing, and imagining that Sisera's mother says something that may be
a "coarse soldier slang" type of term, using the point of view of her
son's men) -- which makes it difficult to draw any absolutely firm
conclusion. But on general grounds, I would have imagined that a term
used by mistresses to deprecate servant girls would emphasize
servility or lowness, or something of that nature, while the etymology
of the term _rah.am_ emphasizes biological femaleness, which perhaps
doesn't quite fit in to the proposed context (though it's difficult to
be absolutely decisive, as I mentioned).

--
Henry Churchyard churchyh AT ccwf.cc.utexas.edu http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page