b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: George Athas <gathas AT mail.usyd.edu.au>
- To: B-HEBREW <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Jerusalem, definitions
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 10:01:42 +1000
peter_kirk AT sil.org wrote:
> Sorry, I was misled by the Turkish and Azerbaijani forms which are
> indeed "Misir", and are derived from the Arabic but apparently with a
> small change. But the point still holds that the Arabic form is from
> the root MCR. I guess that the s in "Misra" is an emphasised
> (pharyngealised) form (the one often transliterated with a dot
> underneath) corresponding to the Hebrew Tsade - can anyone confirm
> that?
Yes, it is indeed. The correct pronunciation would be: MITSR
Best.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
GEORGE ATHAS
Dept of Semitic Studies,
University of Sydney
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tel Dan Inscription Website is at
http://members.xoom.com/gathas/teldan.htm
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-
Re: Jerusalem, definitions
, (continued)
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, Numberup, 09/07/1999
- Re[2]: Jerusalem, definitions, peter_kirk, 09/08/1999
- Re: Re[2]: Jerusalem, definitions, gs02wmr, 09/08/1999
- Re[4]: Jerusalem, definitions, peter_kirk, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, Numberup, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, Numberup, 09/08/1999
- Re: Re[4]: Jerusalem, definitions, Ruthy & Baruch, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, Numberup, 09/08/1999
-
Re: Jerusalem, definitions,
gs02wmr, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, Numberup, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, George Athas, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, George Athas, 09/08/1999
- Re: Jerusalem, definitions, Lewis Reich, 09/08/1999
- Re[2]: Jerusalem, definitions, peter_kirk, 09/09/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.