Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Language prejudice (was: Re[8]: Qatal, 1 Kings 11:1)

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
  • To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: Re: Language prejudice (was: Re[8]: Qatal, 1 Kings 11:1)
  • Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 13:26:57 -0700


Peter wrote:
> Dave Washburn wrote:
>
> "However, I would argue that it is not enough simply to say "somebody
> says it that way, so it must be well-formed." There
> must be some guidelines of some kind for determining what is a
> well-formed clause and what isn't, or we end up back with Humpty
> Dumpty."
>
> I consider it extremely offensive to speakers of minority languages
> and/or "dialects" to suggest that what they speak is not a well-formed
> language, apparently when its syntactic rules are different from those
> of the "standardised" form of the language and/or don't fit a theory
> nicely.

It's not my intention to be offensive to anybody, and it seems to me
that changin the subject line to "language prejudice" is more than a
little confrontational and perhaps trying to start something. I won't
bite in any case. However, from a purely theoretical point of view,
it's still the case that there must be some guidelines of some sort
to determine what is well-formed and what isn't. Otherwise,
anything goes and we may as well throw theory straight out the
window and give up because there's no possible way to study
language scientifically.

If a community speaks in a particular way, it is the job of
> linguists to describe their language and adjust their theories to
> account for it, not to pass value judgments on it on the basis of how
> well it fits their existing theories.

Excuse me, but saying that according to normal syntactic patterns
something is not well-formed is hardly a "value judgment." Again,
it's a scientific approach that understands the nature of generated
language and the fact that particular linguistic societies accept
certain things as well-formed and certain things as not. Trying to
attribute things like "value judgments" and "prejudice" to me goes
far beyond productive discussion, Peter.

> Do I have any support on this list for my view?

I hope not much, because it sounds like you're trying to start a
fight.

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
A Bible that's falling apart means a life that isn't.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page