aifia-metrics AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Towards standard methods and metrics for evaluating IA
List archive
- From: "Livia Labate" <liv AT livlab.com>
- To: <aifia-metrics AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [Aifia-metrics] standards: bottom-up x top-down?
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 03:56:09 -0300
> Rashmi Sinha said:
"provide explicit support for
standards to emerge, rather than create them."
Providing explicit support for the best practice is often a the best way to
make standards emerge, because it happens naturally (bottom-up approach). To
"create" standards (top-down approach) implies that at some point you are
going to need to enforce these standards -- which sound insanely difficult
and not really productive considering just how flexible the work of an IA
is. Works more like an imposition than an actual benefit.
Note: The folks from the Translation Initiative
<http://aifia.org/translations> are beginning to work on a project to get an
understanding of the state of IA in the world through surveying. I told them
to come here and discuss this with you guys, the metric experts :)
Cheers,
Livia Labate
_______________________________
www.livlab.com <-- on vacations!
-
Re: RE: [Aifia-metrics] Agenda for the group,
Christopher Gomez, 07/01/2003
-
Re: RE: [Aifia-metrics] Agenda for the group,
Rashmi Sinha, 07/01/2003
-
[Aifia-metrics] standards: bottom-up x top-down?,
Livia Labate, 07/02/2003
-
Re: [Aifia-metrics] standards: bottom-up x top-down?,
Rashmi Sinha, 07/02/2003
- RE: [Aifia-metrics] standards: bottom-up x top-down?, Marcia Morante, 07/02/2003
-
Re: [Aifia-metrics] standards: bottom-up x top-down?,
Rashmi Sinha, 07/02/2003
-
[Aifia-metrics] standards: bottom-up x top-down?,
Livia Labate, 07/02/2003
-
Re: RE: [Aifia-metrics] Agenda for the group,
Rashmi Sinha, 07/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.