acawiki-general AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Acawiki-general mailing list
List archive
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
- From: Jodi Schneider <jschneider AT pobox.com>
- To: Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>, Neeru Paharia <neerupaharia AT gmail.com>, mike AT creativecommons.org, Greg Grossmeier <greg AT grossmeier.net>
- Cc: "AcaWiki general \(listserv\)" <acawiki-general AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:53:52 +0100
2011/6/22 Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Hi Jodi,
ons, 22 06 2011 kl. 00:51 +0200, skrev Jodi Schneider:
Ha! That is a really funny question. I am practically Brede Wiki. I am
> Do you know who to contact on the Brede wiki about licensing for the
> summaries?
sorry that is not clear from the Brede Wiki description. :-)
You are indeed welcome to add summaries to AcaWiki.
> I think it would be really cool to add summaries to AcaWiki, if Brede
> wiki folks would agree:
> http://acawiki.org/
The only issue would be that the Brede Wiki is distributed with
share-alike while Acawiki is not-necessarily share-alike. As practically
all summaries are written by me I can easily put it under CC-by.
That would be great for clarity -- otherwise we have to keep documentation of individual permissions!
Maybe I
should change the default license?
CC-BY is less restrictive. Unless you are opposed to potential commercialization of your work, CC-BY is better than CC-BY-SA, in the sense that it makes reuse easier. CC-BY is, of course, worse if you prefer copyleft licenses! :)
Have you given any thought as to why
you selected CC-by and not CC-by-sa?
The license was already chosen when I got involved. Neeru, Mike, Greg, any comments?
I suppose CC-by is practically the
standard among researchers, while CC-by-sa stems from Wikimedia
Foundation inspired projects.
CC-BY-SA is pretty recent in Wikimedia:
Note that I can extract all the structured data to a database (not the
body text though) which will/should make it much easier for you to
include the data in your wiki.
Thanks, that would be great! A list, or category page, of the summaries would be helpful, too.
We'll want to figure out how to track summaries, and changes to summaries, going forward, as well.
:) -Jodi
All the best
Finn
--
> -Jodi
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> While awaiting the Okoli-review I have updated my
> Wikipedia/wiki review
> with a few extra pages and references:
>
> http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/6012/pdf/imm6012.pdf
>
> I've also added some hyperlinks.
>
>
>
> Of further interest to Wikipedia researchers may also be the
> 'Wikipedia'
> page on the Brede Wiki which has links to researchers, tools
> and papers:
>
> http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Wikipedia
>
> Please feel free to edit.
>
>
>
> /Finn
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> Finn Aarup Nielsen, DTU Informatics, Denmark
> Lundbeck Foundation Center for Integrated Molecular Brain
> Imaging
> http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/
> http://nru.dk/staff/fnielsen/
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l AT lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Technical University of Denmark
-
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.,
Jodi Schneider, 06/23/2011
- Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review., Jon Phillips, 06/23/2011
-
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.,
Mike Linksvayer, 06/23/2011
-
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.,
Neeru Paharia, 06/24/2011
-
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.,
Jodi Schneider, 06/24/2011
- Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review., Jon Phillips, 06/24/2011
-
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.,
Jodi Schneider, 06/24/2011
-
Re: [acawiki-general] [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.,
Neeru Paharia, 06/24/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.