acawiki-general AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Acawiki-general mailing list
List archive
[acawiki-general] Fwd: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
- From: Jodi Schneider <jschneider AT pobox.com>
- To: "AcaWiki general (listserv)" <acawiki-general AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
- Subject: [acawiki-general] Fwd: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:46:02 +0100
Brede wiki [1] will contribute summaries to AcaWiki! Finn is willing to extract all the structured data to a database; the
body text will still need to be dealt with.
Yeah for more neuroscience summaries!
Anybody want to do the import?
-Jodi
[1] http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Main_Page
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Date: 2011/6/22
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
To: "jschneider AT pobox.com" <jschneider AT pobox.com>
Hi Jodi,
ons, 22 06 2011 kl. 00:51 +0200, skrev Jodi Schneider:
> Do you know who to contact on the Brede wiki about licensing for the
> summaries?
Ha! That is a really funny question. I am practically Brede Wiki. I am
sorry that is not clear from the Brede Wiki description. :-)
> I think it would be really cool to add summaries to AcaWiki, if Brede
> wiki folks would agree:
> http://acawiki.org/
You are indeed welcome to add summaries to AcaWiki.
The only issue would be that the Brede Wiki is distributed with
share-alike while Acawiki is not-necessarily share-alike. As practically
all summaries are written by me I can easily put it under CC-by. Maybe I
should change the default license? Have you given any thought as to why
you selected CC-by and not CC-by-sa? I suppose CC-by is practically the
standard among researchers, while CC-by-sa stems from Wikimedia
Foundation inspired projects.
Note that I can extract all the structured data to a database (not the
body text though) which will/should make it much easier for you to
include the data in your wiki.
All the best
Finn
> -Jodi
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> While awaiting the Okoli-review I have updated my
> Wikipedia/wiki review
> with a few extra pages and references:
>
> http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/6012/pdf/imm6012.pdf
>
> I've also added some hyperlinks.
>
>
>
> Of further interest to Wikipedia researchers may also be the
> 'Wikipedia'
> page on the Brede Wiki which has links to researchers, tools
> and papers:
>
> http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Wikipedia
>
> Please feel free to edit.
>
>
>
> /Finn
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> Finn Aarup Nielsen, DTU Informatics, Denmark
> Lundbeck Foundation Center for Integrated Molecular Brain
> Imaging
> http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/
> http://nru.dk/staff/fnielsen/
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l AT lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
--
Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Technical University of Denmark
From: Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Date: 2011/6/22
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
To: "jschneider AT pobox.com" <jschneider AT pobox.com>
Hi Jodi,
ons, 22 06 2011 kl. 00:51 +0200, skrev Jodi Schneider:
> Do you know who to contact on the Brede wiki about licensing for the
> summaries?
sorry that is not clear from the Brede Wiki description. :-)
> I think it would be really cool to add summaries to AcaWiki, if Brede
> wiki folks would agree:
> http://acawiki.org/
The only issue would be that the Brede Wiki is distributed with
share-alike while Acawiki is not-necessarily share-alike. As practically
all summaries are written by me I can easily put it under CC-by. Maybe I
should change the default license? Have you given any thought as to why
you selected CC-by and not CC-by-sa? I suppose CC-by is practically the
standard among researchers, while CC-by-sa stems from Wikimedia
Foundation inspired projects.
Note that I can extract all the structured data to a database (not the
body text though) which will/should make it much easier for you to
include the data in your wiki.
All the best
Finn
> -Jodi
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> While awaiting the Okoli-review I have updated my
> Wikipedia/wiki review
> with a few extra pages and references:
>
> http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/6012/pdf/imm6012.pdf
>
> I've also added some hyperlinks.
>
>
>
> Of further interest to Wikipedia researchers may also be the
> 'Wikipedia'
> page on the Brede Wiki which has links to researchers, tools
> and papers:
>
> http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Wikipedia
>
> Please feel free to edit.
>
>
>
> /Finn
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> Finn Aarup Nielsen, DTU Informatics, Denmark
> Lundbeck Foundation Center for Integrated Molecular Brain
> Imaging
> http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/
> http://nru.dk/staff/fnielsen/
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l AT lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Technical University of Denmark
- [acawiki-general] Fwd: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review., Jodi Schneider, 06/23/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.