[permaculture] BBC News - Protein flaws responsible for complex life, study says

Lawrence F. London, Jr. venaurafarm at bellsouth.net
Thu May 19 11:18:44 EDT 2011

BBC News - Protein flaws responsible for complex life, study says

Protein flaws responsible for complex life, study says
By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News
SEM of Pyrococcus furiosus archaea Some proteins have remained largely 
unchanged since they first appeared
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories

     'Grape' is key to fossil puzzle
     Ancient ancestor's legacy of life

Tiny structural errors in proteins may have been responsible for changes 
that sparked complex life, researchers say.

A comparison of proteins across 36 modern species suggests that protein 
flaws called "dehydrons" may have made proteins less stable in water.

This would have made them more adhesive and more likely to end up 
working together, building up complex function.

The Nature study adds weight to the idea that natural selection is not 
the only means by which complexity rises.

Natural selection is a theory with no equal in terms of its power to 
explain how organisms and populations survive through the ages; random 
mutations that are helpful to an organism are maintained while harmful 
ones are bred out.

But the study provides evidence that the "adaptive" nature of the 
changes it wreaks may not be the only way that complexity grew.

Single-celled life gave rise to more complex organisms, and with them 
came ever-more complicated networks of gene and protein interactions.

Michael Lynch, an evolutionary theorist at Indiana University, teamed up 
with Ariel Fernandez of the University of Chicago, both in the US, to 
look specifically at protein structure.

They considered 106 proteins shared among 36 modern-day organisms of 
widely varying complexity, from single-celled protozoa up to humans.

The pair were studying "dehydrons" - regions of proteins that make them 
more unstable in watery environments.

These dehydrons - first discovered by Dr Fernandez - make the proteins 
more sticky in water, thereby raising the probability that they will 
adhere to other such proteins.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

     We've opened up the idea that the roots of complexity don't have to 
reside in purely adaptational arguments”

Michael Lynch Indiana University

The analysis showed that organisms with smaller populations - such as 
humans - had accumulated more of these defects than simpler organisms 
with vastly higher population numbers.

The suggestion is that it is the acquisition of these defects, with 
sticky proteins more likely to work together in ever-more complex 
protein-protein interactions, that nudged cellular complexity upward.

"We've tried to bridge the gap between protein structure and evolution 
and believe we've uncovered evidence that proteins develop mild defects 
in organisms with smaller population sizes, over the great divide from 
bacteria to unicellular eukaryotes to invertebrates up to us 
vertebrates," said Professor Lynch.

These slight defects may decrease protein function even as they increase 
protein cooperation.

The authors suggest then that other adaptations occur that "undo" the 
deleterious effects of the sticky proteins.

For example, the protein haemoglobin that carries oxygen in our blood, 
is made of four identical subunits, each with a range of dehydron flaws; 
simpler organisms have globin molecules that accomplish the same job 
with just one subunit.

But the overlap of the four subunits actually masks the flaws in each one.

The authors stress that they are not arguing against natural selection 
as a process; they say rather that it can be aided by "non-adaptive" 

"There's been this general feeling that complexity is a good thing and 
evolves for complexity's sake - that it's adaptive," Professor Lynch 
told BBC News.

"We've opened up the idea that the roots of complexity don't have to 
reside in purely adaptational arguments.

"It's opening up a new evolutionary pathway that didn't exist before."
'A mess'

Ford Doolittle of Dalhousie University agrees that this mechanism, 
separate from Darwin's vision of natural selection, is an important 
Artist's rendering of haemoglobin molecule The haemoglobin protein in 
our blood contains four identical subunits co-operating

"Darwinists are a little bit like the pre-Darwinists before them, who 
would have marveled at the perfection of God's creation," he told BBC News.

"We tend to marvel at the Darwinian perfection of organisms now, saying 
'this must have been highly selected for, it's a tuned and sophisticated 

"In fact, it's a mess - there's so much unnecessary complexity."

While he called the Nature study "important and interesting", he 
disagrees with the mechanism that allows organisms to recover from the 
protein flaws.

He has long argued for a "presuppression" mechanism, in which some 
organisms may have a way to overcome the limited functionality of the 
slightly damaged proteins, and those that do survive best.

"He's putting the cart before the horse," Professor Doolittle said of 
Professor Lynch's idea that subsequent mutations solve the problems 
raised by the protein changes.

"But we both agree that much of complexity does not have an adaptive 

More information about the permaculture mailing list