[permaculture] defining permaculture
healinghawk at earthlink.net
Sun Jun 24 20:17:55 EDT 2007
Thanks for responding. You write beautifully. I've read your post over
and over just to enjoy your prose and the passion with which you've
written. I think if all humans did as good as you have at fitting into
nature, we might have a good shot at surviving the 2030 convergence.
Unfortunately, my sense is that's not the case.
It may be an overstatement, but I think humans are the only species
which seeks to rule nature. I suspect only western culture seriously
engaged that project, but, again, that may be an overstatement. No
other species that I know of seeks to change nature to have it suit
them. Beaver, perhaps. Other than that, only humans take more than
nests and a subsistence living from nature. No "civilization" has
avoided ecological collapse, so far, and our civilization isn't going to
get close without something like a major popular awakening.
I believe humans have as much right to nature's bounty as any species.
I do not believe we have the right to exercise dominion over any part of
nature. We are, as Aldo Leopold said, simple members of the land's
community. We are neither rulers of the land nor its favored
inhabitants. As I've said before, when pond scum is more ecologically
useful than humans, it seems to me like a serious wake-up call.
That said, I seriously fear my current lifestyle. I live in an
apartment in Austin, TX beside a major commuter artery and buy all my
food. There is a food co-op, Wheatsville, but it's a long drive. I
make almost no difference politically, that I can detect, in Austin. I
practice shamanism and write fiction, both of which are therapeutic for
me. I have PTSD from the brutality I experienced in Vietnam (70%
disabled) that consumed my life for twenty years before the VA got a
PTSD diagnosis. I have a great deal of difficulty with handling
stress. My sense is that I am among the most ecologically and socially
vulnerable persons on the planet. Recovery helped, therapy helps, and
shamanism gave me back enough of my soul to live most of the time in my
life. Shamanism is a natural spiritual practice.
I am at work organizing a nature church in Austin called Life Circle.
The aim of this church, to me, is to bring nature religion into the
mainstream and form a true pluralism in US culture. Everyone else
worships God. We worship nature. I don't know the parameters of this
church. Its founders will create those in democratic process. So
democratic process is a parameter, I suppose. This is a long-term shot
at a solution to dominion, in my mind, at least. A solution to
dominion, it seems to me, opens a new door of possibilities.
Otherwise, if my ecological situation doesn't change before 2030, I'm toast.
I'm sorely tempted to buy a piece of land and return to working the
land, which suits me. I have the cash flow of my VA compensation (as
long as the federal government remains solvent) to hold me while I
observe the land, its flows, its inhabitants, its soul, and use that
input for my Permaculture design. Perhaps I'd do some damage control,
but I would try to do nothing until I'm satisfied with my observations.
But I have this piece of me, the mature magician archetype, who serves
his tribe. Mostly Cherokee and Scotch Irish, that I know of, I'm
tribal. My tribe is my Sacred Family: the land and its creatures. So I
observe for a solution larger than saving myself. I know how to save
myself. I don't know how to save my Sacred Family. I feel as if I were
on a sinking ship, though, so the stress eats me alive. Can I save
anyone but myself? Must I save myself first, to enable me to save anyone
else? Can I, in fact, save anyone else? In my early healing, 12-Step
programs taught me that the unwilling can not be saved. They first have
to surrender, to admit they are powerless (though not helpless), and
that their lives are out of control.
So I continue my observation.
More information about the permaculture