Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] java.net migration

xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson AT gmail.com>
  • To: XOM API for Processing XML with Java <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] java.net migration
  • Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:15:40 +0000

On 16 November 2010 01:15, Geoffrey Wiseman <geoffrey.wiseman AT gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Michael Ludwig <milu71 AT gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> I don't know if there is also a HgHub or MercurialHub. Mercurial/Hg
>> passes as being more user-friendly than Git.
>>
>
> BitBucket is probably the leading Mercurial 'hub', although there are
> others, including one run by FogCreek.  I like Mercurial, but GitHub is,
> IMO, a better web service for code hosting than BitBucket and its
> competitors, and git certainly has the momentum (although mercurial does
> seem easier to grok when you're new to DVCS).
>
> Anyway -- I'd say that  Google Code, GitHub, BitBucket or any of those sort
> of services is probably a better move than the Oracle repo, but if Joe can
> get you up on Google Code easily, then that might be the path of least
> resistance.


Google code is really quite easy to set up.
No migration though Elliotte, just a code drop into it.

regards


--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page