Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
  • Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:44:18 +0900

Ladislav Hagara (ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz) wrote [10.04.07 07:38]:
> We should coddle our admins. Admins are certainly part of our project.
> The questions is if they want to be related with us. :-)
>
> Members, Admin and Developers are OK, only we could have more sorcerous
> scheme. :-)

Admins = The Keepers?
Developers = The Mages? (what we have already)
Members = The Blessed? (because we're the best :-P)

--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: pgpecY0CbauFP.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page