Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Wiki Test . . .

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Wiki Test . . .
  • Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:29:06 -0500

Maybe I didn't express myself clearly enough... What I said is: if Drupal has a Wiki, let's use (and maintain, and backup, and customize, and configure) Drupal's Wiki, because we plan to use the whole product *anyway*, *unless* there's a feedback that tells this can't be done.

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
On Nov 01, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT optimaltec.com] wrote:
I never tried to do any productive work in either of these, but I suggest that unless there's feedback, Drupal is used for everything for the sake of simplicity. It's easier to manage and backup one data store rather than two.

We have significant feedback both in this ML and on IRC that we need some
form of wiki. The question right now is if we need a standalone one as has
been discussed in some detail or if drupal's wiki module is enough.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page