Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - [permaculture] Steps Toward an Economy of Permaculture

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: rmhoward@omninet.net.au
  • To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [permaculture] Steps Toward an Economy of Permaculture
  • Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 22:59:00 +0800

STEPS TO AN ECONOMY OF PERMACULTURE

The title is a take from Gregory Bateson's "Steps to an ecology of the mind".
That
book, and Mary O'Brien's "The Politics of Reproduction" have profoundly
influenced my thinking and this essay.

Gregory Bateson talks about three levels of learning, 'rote learning",
"learning to
learn", and "learning to challenge one's learning". To create a permaculture
we
need to challenge the learning of ourselves and of our fellow citizens. We
need all
to become mavens.

Mary O'Brien demands that we recognize that patriarchal economy is built
around
an edifice that denies the existence of reproductive work. Reproductive work
and
productive work differ in three fundamental ways.
(1) time is cyclical in reproductive work but linear in productive
work
(2) reproductive work can't wait, productive work can
(3) reproductive work is necessarily social whereas productive work
is
socially necessary.

Drug addiction (the second biggest aspect of the global economy after arms)
is the
result of the fetishization of cyclical time.The collapse of all meaning into
the "next
fix". This conflation occurs because of fact that linear time is one
dimensional and
hence can be measured in dollars. Kerry Packer has a heart attack and spends
millions on Cardiac ambulance units and needs another man's kidney because
his
time is valued in thousands of dollars per hour and he cannot 'afford' to
spend an
hour a day exercising. Think about it.

Cyclical time is two dimensional which also means that there exists not one
but a
whole series of equilibrium points and hence the idea of 'supply and demand'
is
simply inadequate. It is an old truism that a government is only a day's
starvation
away from a revolution. Yet it is also obvious that in some countries people
starve
before they revolt. What is apparent is that the social conditions (i.e. the
nature of
the government) are a primary determinant regarding which equilibrium point
society will settle around.

Because food(and water) is a reproductive good, (as opposed to a television)
- it's
cost and availability is the single most important material arbiter of the
other
reproductive aspects of society. The 'necessarily social' agreements that
enable
food to be produced and harvested. (from bank credit to the casual labour of
the
harvest, etc). The increase in the price of rice and kerosene(used for
cooking and
lighting) in Indonesia was considered to be the dominant factor in the
downfall of
the Suharto regime. Change does not occur incrementally in cyclical systems.

Women who do most of the reproductive work in the world manage by 'doing many
things at once'. This is a cognitive process that is being put to good effect
in
revolutionary robot software designs. It is also a dynamic restatement of the
permaculture principle that everything should have multiple uses.

There are only 24 hours in a day, in which we must earn enough to satisfy our
reproductive needs ( this assuredly includes children). We are all familiar
with this
economy. Aphorisms like "plenty of money but no time, plenty of time but no
money" sum up this daily dilemma.

But what is happening in a cyclical sense is that we are caught in our
habits.
(Addiction is a pathology of habit.) Because habits are things that we have
'learned
to learn'. Then we must learn to challenge our learning. For Gregory Bateson,
this
is cognitively the equivalent of a zen enlightenment, or a psycho-therapeutic
insight, where a person's behaviour is changed(not just their opinion!).

But this also occurs on a more prosaic level when communities collapse or
individuals lose their jobs. In this case, whether a person learns or dies,
can be the
tragic consequence.

I don't think that we are going to have a choice about reducing our energy
consumption. We don't need to proselytize about the virtue of living
cheaply(or
energy efficiently) because it will be a necessity before long for all of us(
and it
already is for most of the world's population).

The seductiveness of the agrarian solution is easy to understand if you
simply take
a productive view(reducing the transport component, recycling the phosphorus
etc.) But it doesn't work for Australian soldier settler's after two world
wars or for
Year Zero Cambodians. The reason it doesn't work is because farming requires
a
major readjustment to our personal reproductive cycle's. The reproductive
aspects
of farming ("it can't wait") mean that we can't learn on the job in the same
way that i
can learn to make a shoe or a book.

Instead what we need to do is to establish the value of our reproductive
work. In
Australia, we have almost lost sight of the 8 hour day. But it's still out
there. We
know what reproductive work is we simply have lost our voice for articulating
it.

As I said above, it is the social conditions that determine, the equilibrium
of supply
and demand when it comes to reproductive work. This means that with the rich
getting richer and the poor getting poorer which is in effect a result of a
collapsing
supply of reproductive goods (food and water)

Please let's forget about oil for a while and think about the consequences of
the
already occurring climate change! The price of fresh food is rising
inexorably in
the supermarkets today and that's got to do with (1) the consolidation of
multinational power through supermarkets and (2)the 'thousand and one
accidents
of nature' to quote the chemist Berthollet. (He was extolling the virtue of
synthetic
indigo made from coal tar instead of grown in the fields of India, a
discovery that
gave birth to the organic chemistry industry.)

There are a thousand and one accidents now because of the consequences of the
CO2 already present in the atmosphere. This CO2 is there largely because of
the
actions of the US imperium and it's devotion to the so-called capitalist
enterprise.
The rise of agri-business and the rise of CO2 levels have a common cause.

It follows that creative ways of undermining the power of the supermarket
chains
are the most effective - hence farmer's markets work. But we need to bear in
mind
is that supermarket chains are going to price themselves out of poor people's
reach anyway and that the provision of food through communal activity will be
a
necessity. It is to this sort of action that creative thought needs to be
applied.

Lastly, (for now ;-), we should recognize that the power that multinationals
have is
gained through their control over information as much as over resources. Yet
information is the lightest of things. It ways but a light wave and it likes
to be free.

One of the consequences of the internet is that small businesses can benefit
enormously especially if their produce has a high information to weight
ratio. One
of the first things I ever bought on the net was some hand made paper cards
from
Alaska and that was before e-commerce had even started. Now this may have
been energetically irresponsible of me, but it illustrates that the net may
have
unintended consequences when it comes to estimating transport growth and
economic growth. The question is whether when rising oil prices reduce the
amount of bulk goods transported this is offset by a rise in the transport of
value
added goods around the world.

It is clear however, that there is no technological fix, since information is
routinely
kept off the net and resources are controlled by armed guards and these are
the
real issues when it comes to an economy of permaculture. How do we
participate
in the revolution? How can we design a permaculture soup kitchen, or a
permaculture work place? How can we do four things at once? How can we work a
four hour day?


Bob Howard (c). 5 November 2003


There is a quote from an old Albany Noongar whaler, Jack Hansum, who could
spot the whales from the lookout above the harbour before anyone else. He'd
say
"Look as far as you can see, now look farder[sic]" (Albany Advertiser, 1891)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page