Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] no more property rights (does anybody care?)

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Marcia <msmartin AT ccbeunet.br>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] no more property rights (does anybody care?)
  • Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:50:25 -0300

Quoting Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>:

> And if they ask for help, I intend to travel to Connecticut to assist.

You, my brother-in-law, and my husband!




> Marcia wrote:
>
>
> > I’m not sure why this is not getting more media attention, and why people
> seem
> > to not really care. Maybe they don’t understand what this court decision
> > really means?
> >
> > Sorry... but I had to get this out of my system.
>
> I agree. I am so outraged I could chew nails right now. I just didnt'
> want to be the first one to post about it here on INW, since I've been
> responsible for enough political flame fests in the past.
>
> That said, I thing this is a horrible decision by the Supreme Court.
> And regardless of the so-called "Constitutionality" of this eminent
> domain business, it's just plain **wrong**. Personally I'm hoping that
> the homeowners up in New London decide to resist any attempt to seize
> their land, excercising their 2nd Amendment rights if necessary. And if
> they ask for help, I intend to travel to Connecticut to assist.
>
> An interesting post I saw on Slashdot earlier, by some Anonymous Coward,
> concerning this topic:
>
> ----quote-------
> I think this kind of thing was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment
> - you know, the whole militia thing that presumably would be comprised
> of private citizens. I personally would not see any moral problem if
> these homes were protected by using lethal force against police
> evictions or rolling bulldozers. Hell, I would feel compelled to join
> them, despite never having fired a weapon and living in a
> new-development neighborhood that is unlikely to be affected by this
> ruling any time soon. Of course, such a militia would be stopped by
> overwhelming force, with all the limitations imposed on personal
> firearms. And though I have never posted here on the subject of
> privately-owned arms, I firmly believed in some limiitations such as
> those against assault and other military-grade weapons - until I read
> the article and realized the shear rediculousness and inherent
> unconstitutionality of this ruling.
> ------- end quote --------
>
> So yeah, some people are finally starting to grok how this "Freedom"
> thing really works. You can't just sit around and expect the government
> (or anybody else) to protect your Freedom. If you want it defended, you
> have to accept that you may have to do it yourself.
>
>
> TTYL,
>
>
> Phil
> --
> North Carolina - First In Freedom
>
> Free America - Vote Libertarian
> www.lp.org
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>



-------------------------------------------------
WebMail Litoral Internet
www.litoral.com.br





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page