Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tony Costa" <tmcos AT canada.com>
  • To: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc: biblical-studies AT yahoogroups.com, corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:47:13 -0800 (PST)

Jim, I think Paul recognized that the Mosaic law came
to an end or was rendered inoperative with Christ
(Rom.10:4). Thus I don't think Paul saw the Mosaic law
as binding on the Christian any longer. Paul saw
himself as not being under the law, "though I myself am
not under the law" (1 Cor.9:20), but that he was under
a new law, the "law of Christ" (1 Cor.9:21)which I take
to mean the new covenant law.

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:25:40 -0500, Jim West wrote:

>
> In Deut 23:15-16, explicit direction is given that if
a
> runaway slave shows
> up on your doorstep you are not, under any
> circumstances, return said slave
> to his owner. In spite of this, Paul, in Philemon 12,
> tells Philemon he is
> sending Onesimus back.
>
> What gives? Does Paul ignore this apparently quite
> humane legislation or
> does he simply willingly break it?
>
> Any literature is appreciated as well as are your
> insightful comments.
>
>
> Jim
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> Jim West, ThD
>
> http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com Biblical
Theology
> Weblog
> http://web.infoave.net/~jwest Biblical Studies
Resources
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corpus-Paul mailing list
> Corpus-Paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/corpus-paul




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page