Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Loren Rosson <rossoiii AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X
  • Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:16:04 -0800 (PST)


[Moon]
>
> Let S1 be the set of situations in which "you are
> not under the Law"
> hold. Let S2 be the set of situations in which "sin
> will not be the master
> of you" holds. We have "you are not under the Law"
> => "sin will not
> be the master of you". It means S1 is a subset of S2
> (the diagram of S1
> is contained in the diagram of S2). Let C(S1) be the
> complement of S1,
> and C(S2) be the complement of S2. C(S1) is the set
> of situations
> in which "you are under the Law" holds. C(S2) is the
> set of situations
> in which "sin will be the master of you" holds. In
> order to have
> "you are under the Law" => "sin will be the master
> of you",
> C(S1) should be a subset of C(S2). But when S1 is a
> subset of S2,
> C(S1) is NOT a subset of C(S2). Therefore "you are
> under the Law"
> => "sin will be the master of you" does not hold.


Ahhh, I see now. But was Paul this logical?


Loren Rosson III,
Nashua NH
rossoiii AT yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page