Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: MJ Ray <mjr AT dsl.pipex.com>
  • To: debian-legal AT lists.debian.org
  • Cc: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element
  • Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 03:00:16 +0100

On 2004-06-09 01:56:18 +0100 Nathanael Nerode <neroden AT twcny.rr.com> wrote:

3) As for the trademark clause, I agree that the trademark requirement
is burdensome.
This isn't supposed to be an actual part of the license, according to the
source code for the web page; [...]

I missed that. I'm not in the habit of reading licence page source codes in the normal run of things. Yes, it's not clear, as a cursory glance at copies of the CC licence suggests. I see some Nathanael Nerode pointed that out on cc-discuss in March... are we talking into a black hole, or do CC react to that list?

--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Help hack the EuroParl! http://mjr.towers.org.uk/proj/eurovote/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page