Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Eastern Galilee

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Eastern Galilee
  • Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:11:25 EDT


Yitzhak Sapir:

I would greatly appreciate your comments, and the comments of others on the
b-Hebrew list, regarding the important Hebrew spelling issues that apply to
the
names of the city south of Adamah and the city (QD$) north of Hazor. In this
post, which I will try to keep fairly short, I will set forth my
controversial view of Genesis 20: 1, which depends in large part on Hebrew
spelling issues
regarding the name of the city south of Adamah in eastern Lower Galilee.

I agree with the slight majority of scholars who see NGB at item #57 on the
mid-15th century BCE Thutmosis III list as being a reference to the city
south
of Adamah. The name of the city south of Adamah was either (i) NGB, or (ii)
Adami-the-NGB, or (iii) Adami-the-NQB. As we will now see, the varying
spellings are of absolutely critical importance.

Before focusing on the controversial Hebrew spelling issues, however, let me
first briefly state that I agree with the plurality of scholars who see the
location of NGB at item #57, and Adami-the-NQB at Joshua 19: 33, as being at
Kh.
ed Damiyeh, south of Adamah. The “ed Dami” portion of that modern name
nicely carries over the “Adami” portion of the ancient city name. Here once
again is the cite for that great map I previously referenced for Lower
Galilee,
where you can see Kh. ed Damiyeh, which is both NGB at item #57 on the
Thutmosis
III list and Adami-the-NQB at Joshua 19: 33 (while Adamah, by contrast, is T.
Adami on that map):

_http://truthandpurpose.com/?p=113_ (http://truthandpurpose.com/?p=113)

At Joshua 19: 33, the name of the city south of Adamah is spelled:
)DMY-H-NQB. A slight majority of scholars see NGB at item #57 on the
Thutmosis III
list as referencing that same city (which is my view of the case, too). The
critical, controversial question then is this:

Is the reference to “the NGB” at Genesis 20: 1 a reference to the city south
of Adamah in eastern Lower Galilee, rather than being a reference to the
Negev Desert?

When times get tough for Abraham and Isaac in southern Canaan, it would make
more sense for them to go to “the Paradise of Galilee” than to go deep into
the inhospitable Negev Desert. Even if there has been climate change, the
Paradise of Galilee, just north of Adamah near Chinnereth, was a much better
place
to pasture a huge flock of sheep and goats than the middle of the Negev
Desert, and in Galilee Isaac could grow the bumper crop that is referenced at
Genesis 26: 12. In describing where Abraham goes, the first geographical
reference, at Genesis 20: 1, is “region the NGB”.

A slight majority of scholars see NGB at item #57 on the Thutmosis III list
as referencing the city south of Adamah. NGB at item #57 is a perfect match
to
NGB at Genesis 20: 1. All the sources say that an Egyptian G is a gimel/G.
[The other instance of the rare Egyptian G on the Thutmosis III list is at
item #79: RGD. At p. 73 of “The Sacred Bridge” (2006), Anson Rainey shows
RGD
as being ru-gi-sa, with the Egyptian G being a gimel/G, and notes that this
city is referenced in other ancient sources as either ru-gi-si or ru-heth + i

sa, never with a qof/Q. At pp. 36, 82 and 89 of “The Sacred Bridge”, this
city is simply referenced by Rainey as Rogisu, with Egyptian G being
gimel/G.] A
minority of scholars see NGB at item #57 as referencing the Negev Desert,
which would require a G in the middle of the word. However, although that
makes
linguistic sense, all the cities surrounding NGB at item #57 on the Thutmosis
III lists are located in central or northern Canaan, and conquering pharaoh
Thutmosis III never went to the Negev Desert. So in context it makes no
sense
for item #57/NGB to be a reference to the Negev Desert, whereas item #57/NGB
makes perfect sense as a reference to the city in eastern Lower Galilee south
of
Adamah. The Egyptian letters NGB at item #57 are equivalent to the Hebrew
letters NGB that we see at Genesis 20: 1 (and are not an Egyptian version of
the
Hebrew letters NQB). In context, item #57 must be referring to the city in
eastern Lower Galilee that is south of Adamah, not the Negev Desert.

Note that Joshua 19: 33 refers to “the-NQB”, and Genesis 20: 1 refers to “
the NGB”. In both cases, the Hebrew definite article he/H is used.

The sound of NQB is similar to NGB. One possibility is that NGB was the
earlier name, meaning “South”, and NQB was the later name, meaning in this
context “pass”. (Similarly regarding Hazor, HZR on the Thutmosis III list
may be
an earlier, different name of the city later called XCWR in the Bible.)
Whether as an earlier or an alternative name for this city, Adami-the-NGB
makes
perfect sense, as this city was just south of Adamah. So )DM + suffix + the
+
South is located just south of )DM + suffix. And given that “Adami” sounds
so
much like “Adamah”, it would make sense for the city south of Adamah to be
referred to routinely in the shortened form of “the South”/NGB. Perhaps both
of
these names were used interchangeably for this city “south”/NGB of Adamah,
which was also located at a “pass”/NQB.

Let’s now compare my proposed analysis of Genesis 20: 1 with the traditional
analysis. Genesis 20: 1 references, among other things, (i) the NGB, (ii)
QD$, and (iii) GRR. Scholars have been unable to find a single inscription
in
secular history prior to the common era for the NGB, QD$, or GRR south of
Gaza
(or anywhere in the general vicinity of Gaza, such as the Negev Desert or the
Sinai Desert or southern Canaan). By sharp contrast, we have just seen that
a
slight majority of scholars see NGB at item #57 on the mid-15th century BCE
Thutmosis III list as being a reference to a city in eastern Lower Galilee.
QD$, in the original unpointed Hebrew text, is documented in Ugaritic
literature
and elsewhere as being the historical Late Bronze City of QD$ of Upper
Galilee. And in 1907, a German scholar said that KRR at item #80 on the
Thutmosis
III list is Gerar. Our own Yigal Levin has previously said on the b-Hebrew
list
that KRR is Galilee. I think they’re both right. KRR is both GRR/Gerar and
GLL/GLYL/Galilee, recognizing that Egyptian R can be either resh/R or
lamed/L,
and that Egyptian K often comes out as a gimel/G in Biblical Hebrew.

George has given me good advice not to be “speculative”. Note that I
support my controversial view of the NGB, QD$ and GRR at Genesis 20: 1 as
being
located in Galilee on the non-speculative basis that each of those three
geographical names is referenced in Galilee in the well-documented secular
history of
the Late Bronze Age. By contrast, the traditional view has n-o-t-h-i-n-g
in
secular history prior to the common era to back up its traditional approach
of
seeing the NGB, QD$ or GRR at Genesis 20: 1 as being located south of Gaza
(or in that general vicinity).

The Hebrew spelling issues here are critical, and I would like the good
advice of people on the b-Hebrew list as to this. On my controversial view,
I am
linking together, as being references to the same Late Bronze Age historical
city, (i) “the NGB” at Genesis 20: 1, (ii) “NGB” at item #57 on the Thutmosis
III list, and (iii) “Adami-the-NQB” at Joshua 19: 33. I realize that the
middle letter at Joshua 19: 33 is qof/Q, not gimel/G. That is the critical
Hebrew spelling issue here. I would greatly appreciate everyone’s comments
on this
Hebrew spelling issue, which is of great importance in my efforts to show
that the Patriarchal narratives were composed in the Late Bronze Age, using
Late
Bronze Age nomenclature. Though the focus of this particular post has been
on
“the NGB”, I see all of the NGB, QD$ and GRR at Genesis 20: 1 as being Late
Bronze Age nomenclature relating to historical places in eastern Galilee, as
documented in well-known inscriptions from the secular history of the Late
Bronze Age.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois

**************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or
less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page