SALS3 wrote:
empty pure water iMHO not only brings more nutrients into the cellI'm gonna put on my science hat here. Water is capable of holding vast
but carries away more waist. I agree other water is to full to pick up
waste where as distilled water is pure empty and can hold more waste.
quantities of minerals and other compounds. The miniscule amounts of
minerals in non-distilled water are on the order of one thousandth to
one millionth of the total that water can hold. For example, salt in
most tap water is at 5 to 100 parts per million, but water can hold
260,000 parts per million, or 26% salt. So I have a difficult time
believing that removing trace amounts of minerals would significantly
increase water's ability to take away wastes. I suppose from a
homeopathic point of view, removing every last trace of minerals from
water might create a "vacuum" that would attract more nutrients to the
water, but that's not a scientifically supportable hypothesis.
aggressively attracts minerals (it sure sucks them out of pipes and
such) and is thought to deplete the body of minerals if used
extensively. Steve Read's post cites some of the evidence.
There's nothing in nature to suggest that distilled water is good for
animals to drink. Plants and animals live on non-distilled water (and
the biodynamics folks consider distilled water to be dead and thus
harmful to life) so I wouldn't experiment on myself.
Toby
http://patternliteracy.com
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subscribe or unsubscribe here:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
Google command to search archives:
site:https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture searchstring
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.