If you agree with that, I think ברא /bara/ doesn't have to be turnedinto an
infinitive like I thought you and some others would prefer itto be, to make
the subordinate-clause theory plausible (forgive me btwif I misunderstood
you).
Well, it's all beyond me actually, I first have to take a look at manymore
similar-looking lines in the MT.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.