For those non-specialists in Hebrew linguistics, I thought I should point
out that Peter's assumptions about linguistics and classical Hebrew are
more
widely accepted than Rolf's. I am not saying Rolf is right or wrong
(though
I am skeptical), but he would need to present a very strong case indeed in
order to convince most of us.
those of us who are interested?
Ken Penner
McMaster/Hebrew
Dear Peter,
I am sorry but I cannot comment on your arguments below. Our views
regarding linguistics and classical Hebrew are so different
that I see
no purpose in any discussion.
Best regards
Rolf Furuli
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.