On 25/07/2005 22:42, Rolf Furuli wrote:Maybe I was a little unfair to Rolf. After all, he has the right not to reply if he doesn't want to. However, my critique of his argument does not depend on our different theoretical standpoints. I would like to summarise here Rolf's arguments as I understand them, with some comments of mine in [...]
Dear Peter,
I am sorry but I cannot comment on your arguments below. Our views regarding linguistics and classical Hebrew are so different that I see no purpose in any discussion.
Rolf, let me make this clear. I have stated that there is a fundamental logical flaw in your argument, that it simply confirms your initial a priori assumption (that there are two semantically distinct verb forms rather than fouror five). This devastating critique basically implies that your work is valueless. And you are not prepared to answer my critique? That sounds rather like an admission that you don't have a leg to stand on.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.