This may have been so, but, some would say, more likely not have been so. In short, sheer speculation, like much that has been speculated on this subject.
Uri
*/Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>/* wrote:
the kind of model I have in mind is:
1) Deuteronomy was written at one time and place.
2) The other literature e.g. much of Joshua-Kings which so clearly
echoes the languages and themes of Deuteronomy was written at a later
time, and potentially a different place, in imitation, either
deliberate
or accidental, of Deuteronomy.
Therefore, Michael's stylistic argument that Deuteronomy and
Joshua-Kings were written at one time and place fails.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.