xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] XOM is from MIT; JDOM is from New Jersey; DOM is from Hell

From: "Steve Loughran" <steve.loughran AT gmail.com>
Cc: xom-interest <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XOM is from MIT; JDOM is from New Jersey; DOM is from Hell
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:35:32 +0000

On 28/01/07, Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu> wrote:

http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html

:)

New Jersey ML is fairly purist ( http://www.smlnj.org/ ) , so the
MIT/NJ split isnt always valid. But then, SML never went mainstream.

As for DOM, well, if you've ever looked at OS/390 docs you'd have to
conclude that Armonk has to be an origin of some things, or DOM and
Armonk came from the same place...

-Steve

[XOM-interest] XOM is from MIT; JDOM is from New Jersey; DOM is from Hell, Elliotte Harold, 01/28/2007
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM is from MIT; JDOM is from New Jersey; DOM is from Hell, Steve Loughran, 01/28/2007
  - Re: [XOM-interest] XOM is from MIT; JDOM is from New Jersey; DOM is from Hell, Tatu Saloranta, 01/28/2007
    - Re: [XOM-interest] XOM is from MIT; JDOM is from New Jersey; DOM is from Hell, John Cowan, 01/28/2007