XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Ed Davies <edavies AT nildram.co.uk>]

Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Ed Davies wrote:
>
> > Am I right to ignore the advice quoted above or is there a better
> > way to achieve this effect?
>
> You can ignore that advice. It should work for you as you expect. I 
> mostly just wrote that to avoid people adding unnecessary duplicate 
> namespace declarations.

Thanks, I thought it would work OK, though the advice did make me wonder
if I was missing a better way.  I can understand that normally it's a
good idea to let XOM get on with the details of the XML produced but
sometimes it's worth giving it some guidance.

Ed.