xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: "Steve Loughran" <steve.loughran AT gmail.com>
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike AT saxonica.com>
- Cc: xom-interest <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:32:40 +0100
On 28/08/06, Michael Kay <mike AT saxonica.com> wrote:
> Ok. You might still consider the most trivial fix: On
> overflow, have saxon simply change the prefix to one that's
> already been bound to the same URI, and continue as normal.
It works until you start using QNames in content. Because of this problem,
the XSLT and XQuery specs have moved firmly in the direction of treating
prefixes as significant and to-be-retained, though there are exceptions for
example where you generate two attributes of the same element using the same
prefix to refer to different URIs.
But if there were enough people hitting the limit to justify coding and
testing a recovery strategy for use when the limit is encoutered, then I
would be thinking of how to remove the limit.
Or we patch axis so that it tracks the no. of xmlns declarations and
have it refuses to send any message whose payload exceeds some
threshold. For the sake of everyone downstream.
just a thought
-steve
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance
, (continued)
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Elliotte Harold, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Sean Truman, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Michael Kay, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Michael Kay, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
John Cowan, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Wolfgang Hoschek, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Michael Kay, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Wolfgang Hoschek, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Michael Kay, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Steve Loughran, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
John Cowan, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Michael Kay, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Michael Kay, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Sean Truman, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Steve Loughran, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Wolfgang Hoschek, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Tatu Saloranta, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Elliotte Harold, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance,
Sean Truman, 08/28/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Canonicalizer Performance, Nils Kilden-Pedersen, 08/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.