xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Steve Loughran <steve.loughran AT gmail.com>
- To: Dan Diephouse <dan AT envoisolutions.com>
- Cc: xom-interest <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:59:26 +0100
On 9/28/05, Dan Diephouse <dan AT envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> >On 9/28/05, Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Seems you're lucky to not use it with data that would make it fail.
> >>E.g. not using a custom NodeFactory skipping elements, or a DocType,
> >>Comment, PI, ..., other Stax tokens, as outlined previously.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >SOAP Payloads dont have PI elements or doctypes
> >
> >
> Which is what I wrote it for. Which is why I just ignored those for the
> time being.
>
Comments are allowed in SOAP messages. I will have to add some to my unit
tests.
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Steve Loughran, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Steve Loughran, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Dan Diephouse, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Steve Loughran, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/28/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration, Steve Loughran, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Steve Loughran, 09/28/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration, Dan Diephouse, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Dan Diephouse, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Steve Loughran, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Xstream/Stax integration,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/28/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.